Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Women's Individual Sabre


The two Americans in women’s sabre were Dagmara (or Daga) Wozniak and the two-time reigning Olympic champion, Mariel Zagunis. (Note: women’s sabre first became an Olympic event in 2004, so Mariel was the only women’s sabre Olympic champion.)

Mikini v. Bujdoso in the round of 32. Bujdoso attacked for the first two points. Her next point came on a parry riposte. Bujdoso scored again, and then again on a counter attack. 5-0. She attacked for a sixth point. Then Mikina's parry riposte landed, and then Bujdoso's attack was no and Mikina's was yes. Then simultaneous. Bujdoso attacked twice. 8-2 Bujdoso. Only thirty seconds of fencing time had passed.
Bujdoso's counter attack landed to start the second period. Then Mikina's attack hit. 3-9. Bujdoso's attack scored, then Mikina's did. Mikina's counter attack landed and Bujdoso's attack didn't. 5-10. Mikina pushed Bujdoso, and Bujdoso's attack scored, and then again. Then Bujdoso pushed hard and scored. 11-7. Bujdoso's counter attack put her up 12-7. Mikina's attack, then on the next point Bujdoso's attack was no and Mikina's counter was yes. Mikina's attack landed. 10-12. Then there was a simultaneous, nothing done. Mikina attacked and scored. 11-12. She was really coming back -- impressive. Bujdoso then scored on an composed attack. Then simultaneous. Mikina's counter attack landed and Bujdoso's attack did not. 12-13. Simultaneous again. Mikina attacked and Bujdoso fell, and then Mikina attacked again. 14-13, Mikina leading for the first time! Bujdoso attacked, and Mikina parried and her riposte landed. 15-13, Mikina, not at all would have been expected after the first period.

In Mariel’s round of 32 bout, she didn't look really sharp in the first period, and she let her opponent get some simple attacks. However she also pushed well, and she got some nice parry ripostes. In Daga’s round of 32 bout, and she was moving really well and seemed calm. I hadn't noticed that both she and Mariel are lefties. Her next opponent was Azza Besbes of Tunisia, world #8. Mariel’s next opponent was Seira Nakayama of Japan. Nakayama is world #25.

Wednesday, August 1, 2012

Men's Individual Epee


The Americans fencing in men’s epee were Seth Kelsey and Soren Thompson. Thompson lost 4-15 in the round of 32. Kelsey, though, won in the round of 32 and the round of 16.

Seth Kelsey v. Fernandez in quarters.
Kelsey fleched for the first point. Fernandez attacked to Kelsey's torso. Fernandez was awarded the next touch on an opposition parry, but Kelsey asked for video, and the touch was ruled nothing done. Then there was a double touch, Fernandez's attack and Kelsey's counter attack. Then Kelsey scored. Fernandez's attack and Kelsey's counter attack did not land, then Kelsey's attack did. Double touch. Kelsey was ahead at 5-3 at break.
Kelsey started the second period by landing a counter attack. Then a double touch. Kelsey attacked, and Fernandez's counter attack landed but Kelsey's attack didn't. Then double touch, with Kelsey attacking. 6-8. Fernandez attacked, and his attack landed. Kelsey attacked, and Fernandez displaced down for a double touch. Kelsey fleched to go up 10-8, and then his next attack landed. Both fencers stayed pretty high, and they each bounced a little bit. Kelsey was ahead 11-8 to end the second period.
Kelsey scored the first point of the final period on a fleche. Fernandez attacked, and the attack missed, but Kelsey's counter landed. 13-8. Fernandez called for a halt and asked for a doctor -- he lunged and aggravated something. After a couple of minutes with ice, he got back up, and they started fencing again. Fernandez's attack didn't land, but Kelsey's counter did. 14-8. Fernandez attacked and got a hit. 9-14. Kelsey attacked with 10 seconds left in the period to win 15-9. Kelsey was the first American going through to the semis in a fencing event this Olympics.

Earlier in the day, Kelsey defeated the world #1, Nikolai Novosjolov, 15-11. The world #2 also lost in the round of 16, and the #3 lost in the quarters. #s 4 and 5 lost in the round of 16... lots of highly ranked fencers lost. The people remaining have the following rankings (some of these might be slightly off):
Ruben Limardo Gason -- #18
Jung Jinsun -- #9
Bartosz Piasecki -- #47
Seth Kelsey -- #25

Men's Individual Foil


I started watching during the third set of bouts in the round of 32. There were three Americans competing in men's individual foil. Alexander Massialas, number 12 seed and number 13 in the world, won 15-6. Miles Chamley-Watson had lost 10-15. Race Imboden, number 5 in the world, was yet to fence.

Baldini of Italy was leading Miyake of Japan 12-4 with a minute left in the second period. Baldini landed a touch to Miyake's upper torso, but Miyake thought his own off target had right of way. The point was awarded to Miyaki after video, and 13-4 was the score at break. This was a bout of two lefties. Miyake tried to fleche, and both fencers hit off target. Miyake tried again, and was still off target. Miyake then got a touch in some in fighting. Baldwin got a touch to go up 14-5. Miyake fleched and hit. Baldini fleched and missed. Both Miyake and Baldini attacked, but Miyake's did not land, and Baldini's did, so Baldini won 15-6.

Notably in this set of bouts: the reigning Olympic champion, Benjamin Kleibrink of Germany, was defeated by Yuki Ota of Japan. Ota won silver in Beijing. They met so early because their rankings have dropped significantly.

Monday, July 30, 2012

Women's Individual Epee

It's worth noting two things to begin. First, epee is a very deliberate weapon. Of the three weapons, it is the one that most embodies the idea of "physical chess." There's a rule in place that says that after a certain amount of time -- about a minute -- in a period has elapsed with nothing happening (no touches, in the case of epee), then the time will automatically reset to the beginning of the next period, with no break. Second, there is no right of way in epee. This means that if both fencers' lights go off in epee, both fencers are awarded a point. The only exception is in extra time. The point of extra time is to break a tie, so a double touch in extra time is just called simultaneous, nothing done.

Three American women competed in epee. Susie Scanlan lost 13-15 in the round of 64. Maya Lawrence and Courtney Hurley had round of 64 byes, so their first bouts were in the round of 32.

I watched Courtney Hurley's bout against Laura Flessel-Colovic of France, who was their flag bearer. Courtney Hurley held her epee at a higher angle than most people. Laura feinted a lot of attacks. First touch was simultaneous. Second touch both missed first intention, Courtney got second. Third touch was simultaneous. Laura is left-handed. Courtney didn't stay very low -- Laura's knees were much more bent. Next touch was simultaneous, then Courtney attacked and landed on the upper arm or shoulder. 5-3. Laura landed a hit -- looked like it was going to the arm then went lower. Simultaneous on the next one (Laura's attack, Courtney's counter). Next point was Courtney's attack, Laura's counter. 6-7 Courtney ahead. Laura tied it with five seconds left in the period with a touch to the upper inner quadrant of Courtney's torso.
Courtney was bouncy. Laura stayed lower and more turned in, so even when she bounced, it didn't look as bouncy. Laura got the first touch of the period. Her ninth touch came on a fleche. Courtney leaned and ducked a little, and Laura fleched and hit Courtney on the back. Next was simultaneous. Laura led 10-8. It was pretty fast moving, for epee. Attack by Laura was no, and then an attack by Courtney landed. Next touch went to Laura, near the wrist. Then Laura fleched, but the fleche didn't land, and Courtney got the touch. Simultaneous. 11-12, Laura ahead. Laura, on one of the attacks that looks like it'll just be a feint, hit the inner side of Courtney's torso. Courtney got the next touch. 12-13, Laura ahead. Laura lunged in and got a touch to Courtney's leg (at least second intention, maybe third,but all to the leg). And Laura won on another low touch, 15-12.

Men's Individual Sabre

Three Americans were competing in the men's sabre competition:  Daryl Homer, Timothy Morehouse, and James Williams. All three men had byes in the round of 64. Tim defeated Veniamin Reshetnikov of Russia 15-6, which wasn't expected at all. Daryl Homer was expected to win and did, 15-11. James Williams was defeated by Nikolay Kovalev, which was also expected.

Timothy Morehouse and Daryl Homer then won narrowly in the Round of 16. Tim defeated Dmitri Lapkes 15-13. Daryl defeated the Russian Yakimenko, one of the top two in the world, 15 points to 14. Both Tim and Daryl, though, lost in the quarters. Tim lost to Italy's Diego Occhiuzzi, 9-15. Daryl was defeated 15-13 by Rares Dumitrescu of Romania. Also in the quarterfinals, Nikolay Kovalev of Russia defeated the top seed, Nicolas Limbach of Germany, 15-12.

The two semifinals were Diego Occhiuzzi versus Rares Dumitrescu and Aron Szilagyi and Nikolay Kovalev. I missed the Szilagyi-Kovalev bout, but Szilagyi won, 15-7.

After one period, the Dumitrescu-Occhiuzzi score was 5-8. At the beginning of the Dumitrescu-Occhiuzzi second period, in seven seconds of fencing time, went from 5-8 to 7-11.
Once it was 14-9, both were just going in, so quickly, not doing much complicated -- one trying to finish and one trying to save. Dumitrescu got a point the third time they did that. On the next touch, Occhiuzzi was sure he'd won, it seemed, but when it was ruled simultaneous he asked for a new sabre. Dumitrescu clearly got the next point. Occhiuzzi won on the next point, 15-11.

In the bronze medal match, Kovalev was up 4-0, but then Dumitrescu came back and scored 3 points in a row. After twenty seconds of fencing time, it was 6-3, Kovalev.  At period, Kovalev led 8-3. (Note that they weren't even thirty seconds of fencing time in when they went to the next period.)
Kovalev opened the second period by scoring two points in one second. Dumitrescu then scored three points in the next five seconds. Nine seconds into the second period, the score was 11-8, Kovalev.
Kovalev switched sabres when the score was 14-9. Dumitrescu got the next point. Kovalev won on a counter parry riposte, 15-10, thus earning the bronze medal.

The final was fifth seeded Aron Szilagyi of Hungary versus fourteenth seeded Occhiuzzi of Italy. Not-really-related note: In the few bouts of sabre I watched, I was at least three instances of the equivalent of a false start -- someone going before "allez." Szilagyi was rolling at the beginning. First four points were all his, in five seconds of fencing time. For his fifth point, he really pulled Occhiuzzi, and then suddenly attacked, changing direction with little warning. It was very well done.
Twelve seconds into the period, Szilagyi was up 7-0. It was going to take a lot for Occhiuzzi to even make this close. He did get his first point then, so the score was 1-7. Then Szilagyi committed a "false start." Szilagyi then got a point, so the score was 8-1, and that was the end of the first period.
Occhiuzzi got the first two points of the second period. It looked like Szilagyi tried to pull Occhiuzzi again, but Occhiuzzi scored this time. 3-8. Occhiuzzi started to come back a bit. 5-9. After Szilagyi went up 10-5 again, Occhiuzzi pushed and got a point. 6-10. After a few more hits, Szilagyi was up 14-7. Occhiuzzi pushed for the next point and the score was 8-14, but it looked like he hurt his foot or lower leg. Once he got up and walked back to his end of the piste, he looked okay. Far onto his end of the piste, Szilagyi attacked, and his attack landed. Aron Szilagyi of Hungary is the men's sabre Olympic champion.

It's worth noting that seeds don't align perfectly with world rankings. Seeds are drawn, but a higher ranked fencer is more likely to have a better seed.  Still, these medalists were not expected -- Nicolas Limbach of Germany, Alexey Yakimenko of Russia, or Gu Bongil of South Korea were expected.

The Federation Internationale d'Escrime (FIE) rankings have already been updated. Nicolas Limbach is first and Alexey Yakimenko is second (also top two pre-Olympics), but Aron Szilagyi is now third. Gu Bongil is fourth, Dumitrescu is fifth, Kovalev is sixth, and Occhiuzzi is seventh. Daryl Homer has moved up to 12th.

Sunday, July 29, 2012

Women's Olympic Foil

Four years ago, I was very active on the National Novel Writing Month Young Writers' Program (NaNo YWP) forums, and each day, I posted an overview of what had occurred in the fencing at the Olympics.

I decided to continue writing summaries, but I'll post them here, instead.


In the round of 32: Lee Kiefer v. Monica Peterson, American v. Canadian. Lee dominated the beginning of the first period, and then Monica came back and was within a point of Lee, who then changed foils and started scoring again. The second period was mostly Lee -- Monica got a few touches, including a couple after Lee was at 14 points, but Lee was in control.
Both women are five foot four, but Lee has longer legs. Sometimes she sits really low and deep, but other times she's pretty high up -- higher than Monica, who also leans a little. Lots of off-targets and in-fighting in this bout, and it moved pretty quickly. They didn't go up and down the piste a lot. Their first intentions came early, and usually either a first or second intention hit or was off-target.

So Lee Kiefer is the only American female foilist to advance past the Round of 32. It's disappointing for Nzingha Prescod and Nicole Ross; Zingy especially was expected to do better than she did.

Other important results: Elisa di Francisca rolled over Mona Shaito. The first period was reasonable (6 to 2), but in the second period Elisa scored 9 points and shut out Mona. Valentina Vezzali, defending gold medalist, won 14 to 8.

Lee's next bout is in the second half of the Round of 16 against Gil Ok Jung, who beat Aida Shanaeva 15 to 14 in the Round of 32. In the first half, though, is #1 in the world, Hyun Hee Nam of S. Korea, against Aida Mohamed, who defeated Nzingha Prescod in the Round of 32. I saw a bit of Carolin Golubytskyi (of Germany)'s previous match - she did very well, and has a non-bouncy style I like - but in this round she's matched up against Elisa di Francisca, who looked positively dominant.

So, in the round of 16 are three French, three Italians, two Japanese, two South Koreans, one Russian, one German, one American, one Chinese, one Hungarian, and one Tunisian.
The only competitors who rolled like Elisa di Francisca in the round of 32 were Astrid Guyart of France (won 15-2) and Arianna Errigo of Italy (won 15-4). Neither Nam nor Vezzali, the favorites, were as dominant. Astrid faces Ines Boubakri of Tunisia, who defeated Nicole Ross. Arianna Errigo faces Kamilia Gafurzianova, who defeated Martyna Synoradzka15-8.

Hyun Hee Nam was up 3-1 against Aida Mohamed at the end of the first period. They're moving up and down the piste a lot, and lots of off-target when they do manage to attack. Nam can be really bouncy at times. 4-4 at the second break. Nam needed to stop missing her ripostes, and  she to be careful when the taller Aida was in distance but Nam wasn't.
At the end of the third period it was 6-6, so extra time. Nam thought she won on a parry riposte, but the director called off-target. After a few minutes, the result was no point and a yellow card for Nam. On the next point, though, she got the touch and won.
In the other bouts. Arianna won 15-7. Astrid lost 10-15. Chieko Sugawara of Japan beat Corinne Maitrejean of France 15-9.

Now Lee Kiefer v. Gil Ok Jung. They were moving a lot. At the first break, Lee was up 4-2, and there had been some infighting near the end of the period. Lee was moving a lot better than she showed against Monica. The infighting increased dramatically, as did the off targets. Jung came on strong at the end of the second period. Tied 11-11 with 1:42 left in the third period.  Lee was moving better again. It was close at the end, with Lee up 14-13, and they had to check the last touch on video, but Lee won, 15-13.

Carolin Golubytskyi gave Elisa di Francisca some trouble in the first two periods of their Round of 16 bout. It was 9-8 Elisa with two minutes left in the third period. Elisa is tall, but she was sitting pretty deeply in her en garde. The last two minutes were almost all Elisa. She won 15-9.

Ikehata won 15-11. Valentina Vezzali won 15-6, so that sounds like it was pretty easy for Valentina.

In the quarters, Ines Boubakri against Valentina, Lee against Arianna, Chieko Sugawara against Elisa, and Ikehata v. Nam.

So, Lee and Arianna. Arianna scored the first two touches, but Lee responded with two touches on ripostes. Lee was sitting pretty far down in her en garde this match. Arianna was leaning a lot. Lee’s back foot was a lot more turned out than Arianna’s – actually, maybe Arianna’s is turned in more than normal – and Lee’s en garde was pretty wide. Lee got a point on an attack and then on a counter riposte. They were barely using any time because they're just coming in. Arianna got a couple of touches with attacks in preparation on Lee, and Arianna led 13-8. The final score was 15-10, Arianna Errigo winning.

Elisa definitely used her reach against Sugawara. Elisa, 15-9. Nam won 15-6. Boubakri and Valentina were tied 7-7, in extra time, and Valentina won. So three Italians and Nam in the semis.

Nam v. Elisa. Elisa towers over Nam. Both fencers stayed really low and had wide en garde positions. The crowd was very much rooting for Elisa. They weren't moving much, small steps, rocking back and forth. Elisa was trying to hit Nam's blade, but Nam was keeping it up off target. Nam is a lefty, but it wasn’t really helping her. A lot of her hits were off-target, closer to Elisa's arm. It was 2-2 at the end of the first period. Nam got some good touches on Elisa’s upper outside quadrant. At the end of the second period, the score was 5-5. Nam was bouncing off and on throughout the bout, but she was really bouncy at the beginning of the third period. Both fencers were moving their blades, but Nam was using a huge vertical range, and Elisa was mostly keeping hers on target. The beginning of the third period was all Nam, and she was up 9-5. Elisa, however, came back, and the crowd was supporting her very vocally (singing, clapping, chanting).  The third period ended with the score tied 10-10, so extra time. Eight seconds into extra time, Elisa’s attack landed, and she won, advancing to the final.

Valentina and Arianna. Valentina won the first three points. Arianna started attacking, then – she seems more comfortable on offense – and so she lead 6-5. Arianna kept her foil at a higher angle in en garde than did Valentina. They started moving more. Lots of off-targest by Arianna. Arianna did a good job landing her ripostes. On the rare occasion that Arianna missed a riposte, Valentina did a good job of landing a remise. Quick touches, using very little time. The end of the first period, and the score was 12-9, Arianna. Valentina fought back a little at the end, but Arianna won, 15-12.

So it was Nam and Vezzali in the bronze medal bout. Vezzali bent her back leg a lot more than did Nam. They were both down really low, and there was a lot of  blade contact. They barely move, and then one of them attacks really suddenly. At the end of the first period, it was 2-2. In the early second period, they kept getting really close to each other and then passing each other, causing halts. It was 6-4 Valentina at break. Valentina got a yellow card, but I didn’t see why. Nam got lots of touches quickly, and it was 10-6 Nam. Valentina, though, came back, and with 9 seconds left in the third period, she was down 10-12. In the last nine seconds, she got two touches, so they went into extra time tied 12-12. Neither fencer attacked early in the extra time, but eventually Valentina attacked and got the touch, securing an Italian sweep of the medals.

And the final!
Arianna v. Elisa. The tall Italian bout.
They both geot really low occasionally, but they didn't stay low much. Arianna is also a lefty. How did I not catch that? The first two touches were Elisa's. They were both moving their blades a lot. Their styles seemed so similar except that their en garde was somewhat different. At period it was 3-2 Elisa. They were both beating the other's blade. Lots of off target, lots of attacking without much warning (my coach called that exploding). Arianna made some mistakes – there was one touch where she just ran at Elisa. It looked like she was going to fleche, but she never actually did. They were doing a sort of flow more than anyone else I watched bout today. Not the very set flow I learned, but a flow, just going with each other. It was 7-7 after break. Arianna got ahead 10-8, but Elisa came back and tied it 11-11. This was still the score at the end of the third period. Early on in extra time, Elisa attacked, and her attack landed. Elisa di Francisca is the gold medalist.

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Balance and Swing

Before, the room is never crowded. Most people hang to the sides, waiting, sitting, drinking water, talking. The band is on the stage, but they're quiet.

Already, though, it's clear that something is going to need lots of space.
Why else would the center of the room be completely clear?

It's a church, a school, a library -- anywhere with a large, open room. Usually old. Often poorly lit.

But once the music starts, none of that matters, because it's a contra dance.

A mixer comes first, to teach the basics. Everyone stands in a circle and holds hands with their neighbors. Maybe everyone will walk to the center of the circle and then back out. Maybe there will be a circle right and then a circle left, or the other way around. But there is movement through the circle. One does not stay between the same two people. Pass by shoulders, pull through, a la main -- there are lots of ways to rotate.
And then there is the balance and swing.

A balance. The pair takes hands. Both step in, bounce, then step out and bounce. On the step out, it's common for the lady's left hand and the man's right hand to release. This allows them to pull farther apart, which isn't important for the balance but is important for the swing.

A swing. There are many ways to swing, but really, it's just the pair spinning in a circle.
Usually, the lady's left hand is on the man's right shoulder, the man's right hand is on the lady's back, and then they hold hands on the lady's right. The two can either walk around each other (a walking swing), or they can each leave one foot in the center and pivot around it (a buzz step). Buzz step swings are usually much faster.

Some people don't think faster swings are necessarily more fun.

I'm not one of those people.

The balance and swing is the basic step of contra, and practicing it is truly the point of the beginning mixer.

After the mixer, the dances begin. Find a partner, stand in a set -- two long lines, standing across from your partner. Partners move up and down the set together, and as the dance repeats, over and over the partners find each other for a balance and swing.

The fiddle, the caller, the colorful spinning skirts, the loud stomp on a "long lines!", the old man in a kilt.

Two women pull past each other in a ladies' chain, and the men guide them around in a half circle, a courtesy turn -- and maybe they add a twirl or few.
 I live for the twirls in a courtesy turn, even if life isn't quite contra dance.

There's a break in the middle, because contras are not short affairs. They usually last at least two and a half hours, and more often at least three.
Before the break, and at the very end of the dance, there is a waltz.

The waltz calms and lingers, so different in style, movement, music from the contras, but a contra without an ending waltz feels incomplete.

Three years ago today, my first contra dance ended with a waltz, and I had learned to balance and swing.

Monday, June 25, 2012

The Championships, Wimbledon

My summers at home as a child, before I started going to camps, all blur together. It is not because I don't remember them, but because there were such patterns that it is hard to tell one year from the next.

Summers were for staying home with my dad. Summers were for hitting balloons around and trying to keep them from touching the ground, a game I ended up calling Pompidou. Summers were for sunball, my odd variation on baseball.

They were for going to dance. They were for my dad doing my bun in what he called a "funny bun," because the shape was never quite neat and classical, but they were always sturdy, and no dance class ever succeeded in destructing them. Summer was for black leotards, once I had reached Division 1 at dance instead of being in pre-ballet, and I've always loved my black leotards. Summer was for more hours dancing per week than during the school year, smaller classes, and greater variety in teachers.

After I started learning to skate, summers were for spending an hour or so a couple of times a week at the rink, just going around in a circle. They were for stopping to get snow cones on the way home from the rink. They were for finding out what Tiger's Blood was and then coming up with all kinds of other combinations with banana of various red and orange shades and calling them different types of cat bloods -- to this day, my favorite is Snow Leopard's Blood: watermelon and banana.

Summers were for watching lots of baseball. The college world series, pro baseball all summer, and then Little League in August. Lots of summers we went to Houston to visit my grandparents, and we went to Astros games. The first Astros game I remember was in the Astro Dome. I remember going to see games in Minute Maid when it was still Enron. We almost always sat on the first base side, which meant that summer was for proclaiming Jeff Bagwell as my favorite player. (He's six or seven years retired now and that's still true.)

Summer was for Vacation Bible School. The first VBS I remember is the 1998 Cokesbury VBS, which was Storytelling Tree. My dad was assistant director and one of the people in opening in 2001 for Way to Go, and he was director in 2002 for God's Great Gallery. We always had the CD of VBS music at some point in the spring, so by the time it was actually the week of VBS, I already knew all of the songs by heart.

But finally, summers were for tennis. The summer starts with the French Open, Roland Garros, the images of Paris and the bright orange clay. My dad spent seven-ish years as a kid in Belgium, so we cheered for the Belgian players, Justine Henin and Kim Clijsters, and Justine's best tournament was Roland Garros. And then, just a few weeks later, is Wimbledon. Grass, so different from clay, all white, and the tournament that Justine could never win.

Despite watching for all these years, I still don't know a lot of technical things about tennis. But I can talk about it decently, and I love watching it. That love started with those summers with my dad. Baseball was for the afternoons and the evenings. Tennis, because it was in France and London, seven and six hours ahead of CDT respectively, was for the mornings. I remember dancing around the foyer in my leotard and tights, waiting to go to dance class, with Wimbledon on the television.

As I grew up, I was always home for the French. It was so early in the summer that I was never gone that soon. So the French I could see from home.
Wimbledon, though. At least one week of Wimbledon, I was usually gone, starting in 2006.

In 2006 for at least the second week of Wimbledon I was at Duke Young Writers' Camp. We had to walk a ways from the dorm to get to a computer lab, but whenever I went I would check the scores and the bracket, and I emailed my parents about tennis. That year, Amelie Mauresmo won Wimbledon. Justine was the other player who reached the finals, after she had defeated Kim in the semis. I was disappointed that Justine had lost, but Mauresmo was French, and French players were my favorites after Belgians.
Evidently Federer won Wimbledon that year against Nadal. I don't remember that, but at the same time, if you'd made me guess, I would have done so correctly.

In 2007 again I missed at least the second week of Wimbledon. I was at GERI at Purdue, and I remember that sometimes they showed Wimbledon on tiny tv screens in the dining hall. I don't remember anything about Wimbledon that year, though again, I can tell you that Federer won and that he defeated Nadal in the final. And I just looked it up, and Venus won women's singles that year.

2008. Now 2008 I remember. I missed all of the tournament to be at Lac du Bois, a French immersion camp. Most of the news we got from the outside world was in the form of mail from our families. It was the year of a Euro, and that news got through camp decently well because... well, it was a *French* camp, so of course the soccer news traveled. But tennis? Fewer people seemed to care. My father had a habit from my past years at Lac du Bois (2005 and 2006) of sending me newspaper clippings, especially about sports. That was the year that Fresno State won the College World Series over UGA -- I remember because he sent me the article.
But the article I remember better than any other is the one about the several-times-rain-delayed, several hour finals match at Wimbledon between (guess who!) Nadal and Federer.
The match that Nadal won.
I was so excited about getting that particular article that I shared it as my bonne chose at cabin meeting that night. At cabin meetings we all went around said one good thing (bonne chose) and one bad thing (mauvaise chose) about the day, and when I said that my bonne chose was that my dad had sent me an article about Nadal beating Federer, one of the other girls (French name Adelaide, English name Rachel) got really excited, too. So after cabin meeting, Adelaide and I talked excitedly for quite a while. It was one of the few moments that summer when I felt really close to someone in my cabin.
That was also the year that Venus defeated Serena to win ladies' singles, and then they together won ladies' doubles.

In 2009 and 2010 I was at Mathcamp for the second week of Wimbledon, but at Mathcamp I had a laptop, so I was able to check scores regularly. I don't remember a lot from either year, honestly, which probably speaks to the awesomeness of Mathcamp. The second week of Wimbledon was also the *first* week of camp, and the first week of Mathcamp is really important for getting used to the culture and getting a vague idea for what classes one wants to take during the rest of camp.
I know that in 2009, Federer won, Serena beat Venus, and they won doubles again.
2010, what I remember best is actually from the first week, before I left for Mathcamp -- the Isner-Mahut match. Seriously, 70-68 in the last set? It was amazing. I remember posting a status the second day of the Isner-Mahut match about ridiculous tennis, good college baseball, and World Cup soccer. I don't remember anything from the second week. I vaguely knew that Nadal had won that year, but at Mathcamp, I wasn't paying that much attention.

Last year, 2011, I was at a camp at MIT. I had a math research project, which meant that other than meeting with my mentor for an hour or two per day, my time was my own to spend. I worked in the MIT Student Union, the W-20. I liked sitting in the comfy arm chairs on the ground floor of the W-20 -- one chair in particular right by an outlet. I would plug in my laptop, put on my headphones, and get out my notebook and pen/pencil to try to make progress on my math research problem.
What did I listen to -- music? Well, some of the time. But in the mornings and early afternoons, almost never did I listen to music.
Wimbledon Radio.

Someone pointed out at one point that I could actually watch Wimbledon on my computer, but I never really considered it. I couldn't really watch tennis and work at the same time. But I could listen to tennis and work.
And I did. I remember sitting in the W-20 listening to Petra Kvitova win. I remember rooting so hard for Sabine Lisicki once it became apparent that she could do well.

This year is the first time in seven years that I've been home for both weeks of Wimbledon, which started today. This is Kim Clijsters' last Wimbledon, and she won her first round match against Jankovic. Isner lost in five sets in the first round. Venus Williams lost in two sets in the first round. Federer is moving on. Melanie Oudin, who I remember reaching the fourth round in 2009, lost. Sabine Lisicki won her first round match.

There is nothing quite like summer.
Welcome back to The Championships.

Sunday, May 20, 2012

Zwei tausend und elf (2011), first half

January -- I attended the Joint Math Meetings in New Orleans. I went to lots of research presentations on graph theory and the math or puzzles and games and saw lectures on the math in Pixar and fluid dynamics. I explored the exhibits, left with two new math books, and in general spent a lot of time in the Sheraton on Canal Street. I had beignets at Cafe du Monde every morning, and my father and I always found somewhere delicious to eat for lunch and supper --I love Cajun food -- and we only planned the meals ahead of time three times that I remember.
After we got back, I started school, and had the following classes: American Literature, American History, German I, Organic Chemistry II, Special Topics in Math, Data Structures I, Thermal Physics and Waves and Optics, and Differential Equations. 8 classes, but only one lab (physics, TWO for short). Compared to the semester before, my schedule looked like I had lots of free time.
In January I was in the middle of applying for summer camps. I applied to two research camps and was working on an application for a third.

February -- Math contests: the AMC12A and AMC12B. I did better on the A than the B (well enough to qualify for AIME, the next contest), even though I thought the B was easier.

March -- March was all the other competitions: TEAM+S engineering, Chemistry Olympiad local, and AIME. The junior team for TEAM+S wasn't set until a week before the competition, but we still did very well on Part 2, the free response section, just not so well on the multiple choice. Chem Olympiad Local seemed to go pretty well, so I was hoping to qualify for the national exam. AIME was at the very end of the month -- either on the 30th or the 31st. It could have gone better, but the problems were interesting, as always.
Over spring break I went on college visits.
My parents and I flew to Atlanta and visited Georgia Tech, which I really liked. I'd been worried about the school feeling huge, but I liked the campus, and it's very contained. I like their study abroad, co-op, and internship programs, and they have an active Wesley Foundation (which I got to visit!) and an active fencing team. The only thing that worried me was the size of the mechanical engineering department -- there are more than twice as many people per year in the mechE department alone than in my high school.
Next we flew to Baltimore, and we visited Johns Hopkins and University of Maryland, though we also had the chance to walk around Baltimore, eat in Little Italy, and have delicious crab cakes. Anyway. University of Maryland did feel big to me, and unlike at the other two schools I visited I didn't have the chance to talk to anyone in the mechanical engineering department. Of the three schools, it's the one to which I decided not to apply. At Johns Hopkins I actually talked to the most helpful mechanical engineering person. He took me to see a couple of labs, including a fluid mechanics lab -- so awesome.
At the end of spring break, I learned that I had been accepted to my top choice of the summer camps, so I responded to that acceptance and withdrew my applications from the other two.

April -- I learned early on in April that I had qualified for National Chem Olympiad, so that exam was in the middle of the month. I didn't prepare as well as I could have, and the group from Oklahoma was much smaller this year than it had been in the past. I went with one other girl from my school, who did very well, and we had a lot of fun.

May -- May started with AP tests -- Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism, US History, Computer Science, English Lang and Comp, and Statistics. After that I had final presentations instead of exams for Differential Equations and Special Topics in Math, and then final exams for my other six classes. At the end of school, we received our summer homework: for World Literature, Anna Karenina. For Western Civilization, excerpts from the Hebrew Bible as well as the Oresteia.
After leaving school my family went to San Antonio for a family reunion. We ate Mexican food and barbecue (yumm brisket), played lots of 88 (dominoes!), and went to Fiesta Texas and Sea World. It was the first time in years that we were *all* there, so that was cool.

June -- I spent the beginning of June at home writing -- err, trying to write college essays. I think out of everything I wrote this summer, I used one essay. Maybe two. I did get a feel for what I was able to write well about and what I wasn't. I learned I couldn't write a good extra-curricular essay (which has to be very short) about jazz dance or fencing. I couldn't write briefly so well about jazz, and the fencing attempts got too technical. The best extra-curricular essay I wrote this summer? Academic Team. Also the one I ended up using.
I worked one day at a local math workshop for middle schoolers, and this was the third year I had done so (though my first time not working all three workshops). This time, I TAed two classes, which was my normal job, but then before the last class the teacher had to leave...so I taught. The class I was teaching was some simple heat transfer math, which fits for my mechE interest, so that was a lot of fun.
After that, I flew north for camp -- but first a stay with one of my close friends/sister from Mathcamp. I stayed at her house for four or five days, went to a scholarship lunch with her, helped her bake and ice cake and cupcakes for her graduation party, attended said party, and spent a lot of time playing Mancala and variants. We went into the nearby large cities one day to meet up with some other Mathcampers, went to cool museums, ate at a yummy bakery/sandwich shop, and played card games.
Then camp!

Rest of June and July -- All camp. The first week was classes: computer class, humanities (focusing on Frankenstein), engineering (taught by an electrical engineer), and math (focused on some really interesting number theory). At the end of the first week I learned I would be doing mathematics research in graph theory with a grad student.
That was bumpy. I definitely learned that as much as I like math, it's not what I want to do with my life -- I thought I knew that, but now I'm sure. I really loved my project, but my father's description of research to me (you hit your head on a wall for a while, pull back, the wall falls down, and then behind it there's another wall) definitely fits.
I was also disappointed with the social aspect of camp. I had a few good friends, but I had loved Mathcamp people and activities in 2009 and 2010, and camp this year didn't live up to that standard for me.
I still got a lot out of going to camp. I know so much more about writing research papers and giving presentations (even if I'm still not all that good at it), I learned I don't want to be a mathematician, and even if I didn't click with many of the people, I've seen their names come up for all sorts of awards and competitions this year. Most of them want to be research scientists and not engineers (and definitely not industry engineers, like me), but it's still a good group of people to know. I've thought about it a lot, and I've come to the conclusion that even if I had known what camp would be like, I still would have gone.

Saturday, April 7, 2012

Dance, then, wherever you may be.

"Faut-il qu'il m'en souvienne
La joie venait toujours apres la peine."
"L'amour s'en va comme la vie est lente
Et comme l'esperance est violente."
-- Guillaume Apollinaire's "Sous le Pont Mirabeau," and with these I agree so much.

From the same poem:
"Passent les jours
Et passent les semaines
Ni temps passe ni les amours reviennent."
With this -- with this I do not always agree.

"Heart of my own heart, whatever befall
Still be my Vision, O Ruler of All."
- Be Thou My Vision

"I want to change my mind
I want to be enough
I want the water in my eyes
I want to cry until the end of time."
-- Sara Bareilles' "Let the Rain"

"I keep movin' along
Until I can get through this
But maybe this song is the best I can do it."
-- Vanessa Carlton's "Heroes and Thieves"

"Love beyond degree"
-- "Alas! And did my Savior Bleed"

"How deep the Father's love for us,
How vast beyond all measure"
-- "How Deep the Father's Love for Us"

"My voice shakes along with my hands."
-- Stephen Speaks' "Out of my League"

"'For I know the plans I have for you,' says the LORD, 'plans for your welfare and not for harm, to give you a hope and a future.'"
-- Jeremiah 29:11

lyricless
Seamus Egan's "Weep Not for the Memories;" Penguin Cafe Orchestra's "Perpetuum Mobile;" Mark Mothersbaugh's "Mothersbaugh's Canon"

"How much do I love you?
Count the stars in the sky
Measure the waters of the oceans with a teaspoon
Number the grains of sand on the seashore
Impossible, you say?"
-- Philip Glass' "Knee Play 5"

Thursday, December 22, 2011

Christmas Music

I really like Christmas music, though I only listen to it during Advent and Christmas.

Ten Christmas songs I like, with numbering for organization and not rank:

1. Bring a Torch, Jeanette, Isabella (Un Flambeau, Jeannette, Isabelle). It's not really a song that makes a lot of sense, but I think it's pretty. My favorite part is the end of the first verse: "Ah! Ah! Ah! Que la Mère est belle, Ah! Ah! Ah! Que l'Enfant est beau!" Mannheim Steamroller's version makes me happy, too, and I used to play it while stirring sauce for pasta.

2. O, Come All Ye Faithful. This has been one of my favorites for a long time, mostly because when I was younger I liked songs with repetition. I also have a version of this in Spanish that I like -- Spain Spanish. "Venid Fieles Todos." (You can tell it's Spain Spanish because it uses vosotros...)

3. One Quiet Moment. This and the next two songs are sung only by a group called GLAD as far as I know. One Quiet Moment is mostly about Mary and Joseph before the birth and raising Jesus. The chorus is: "And in one quiet moment, a woman and man accepted the part they would have in God's plan -- to give up His glory and be born as a man, in one quiet moment."

4. In the First Light.
This and One Quiet Moment are two of my most listened to songs, and definitely my most listened to Christmas songs. It covers birth through resurrection. "In the first light of the new day, no one knew He had arrived. Things continued as they had been while the newborn softly cried." And later: "As his mother held him closely, it was hard to understand that this baby, not yet speaking, was the Word of God to man."

5. All the World Was Waiting. One Quiet Moment and In the First Light are on GLAD's A Capella Christmas, but this is on their Voices of Christmas. It also covers birth through resurrection. "All the world was waiting the night that You were born, God of life eternal in a fragile form Shepherds gathered closer, gazing at Your face, wondering how this helpless child could save a fallen human race." And at the end: "All will be accomplished, our trials and tears will end, and those who’ve longed to see You will never wait, will never wait, will never wait again."

6. I Believe in Santa's Cause. Statler Brothers. "Now there are those who don't believe in miracles of Santa Claus, but I believe what I believe in -- I believe in Santa's cause." This song says perfectly everything I think about Santa.

7. Il Est Ne. (He is Born.) I don't like this song as much in English, but I really like it in French. "Jouez hautbois, resonnez musettes!" And the first verse: "Depuis plus de quatre mille ans, nous le promettaient les Prophetes; Depuis plus de quatre mille ans, nous attendions cet heureux temps!"

8. St. Nicholas by Sheryl Cormier and the Cajun Sounds. This is in French Lousiana Creole, and I don't understand most of it, but the mood is so happy, and I like what I do understand of it. Basically, I love Cajun music.

9. Rise Up, Shepherd, and Follow. I first heard this sung by GLAD, but it's in the Faith We Sing, under "There's a Star in the East," since that's the first line. "If you take good heed to the angel’s words, rise up, shepherd, and follow. You’ll forget your flocks, you’ll forget your herds, rise up, shepherd, and follow."

10. Snow Miser/Heat Miser. "The Year Without a Santa Claus" is one of my favorite Christmas movies (along with "Santa Claus is Comin' to Town" -- yay Rankin-Bass!), and these two songs that are basically the same song are my favorites from the movie. Err, tv special, originally. But really: "I'm Mr. 101" versus "I'm Mr. 10 below."

2011 Book Post

Spoilers ahead. For a lot of novels and plays.

1. American Literature class
My class read All my Sons and Death of a Salesman by Arthur Miller, The Little Foxes by Lillian Hellman, A Raisin in the Sun by Lorraine Hansberry, A Yellow Raft in Blue Water by Michael Dorris, and The Poisonwood Bible by Barbara Kingsolver. I also read one of the books the other class read, Snow Falling on Cedars by David Guterson.

-- All My Sons. This was definitely the play I preferred of the two Miller plays. They both had lots of lies floating around, but this one wasn't half reality half dream. I also love Chris' line near the end: "You can be better! Once and for all you can know there's a universe of people outside and you're responsible to it."

--Death of a Salesman. I just found this hard to read -- not difficulty-wise, but in the way of being something I didn't really want to read. The yelling and the wandering...ack. Between this and All My Sons I had Miller-ish dreams for weeks.

-- The Little Foxes. This was my favorite of the three plays we read. I suppose technically Regina's the protagonist, but she's an amazing villain -- smarter than the others give her credit before, hiding behind what she appears to be, so selfish. Zan is awesome, and I agree with Regina at the end; it seems like Zan is just there, can't do anything, and then all of a sudden she has this backbone. . I rather like Ben Hubbard, too: "There are hundreds of Hubbards sitting in rooms like this throughout the country. All their names aren't Hubbard, but they are all Hubbards and they will own this country some day."

-- Snow Falling on Cedars. Sometimes too much scenery description for me, but it was fascinating to watch all the pieces fall together, and Hatsue telling Ishmael to live is gorgeous.

-- A Yellow Raft in Blue Water. The first time I read through this, I liked Rayona, thought Christine was whiny, and was so-so on Ida. Then for a class assignment I was assigned to the group on Ida, and by the end I knew every detail of Ida's section of the book, and she became my favorite character (or at least equal to Rayona). The three sections with all the braiding mentioned is cool structurally and as a symbol.

-- The Poisonwood Bible. I had Miller dreams after reading his plays, and I had Adah's voice in my head for more than a month after reading this. Luckily, I'm okay with that -- Adah's my favorite character and it was evident after reading her first section that she was going to be. I like her intelligence, her bitterness, her references to Emily Dickinson, her backwards writing, her palindromes -- but I love that she grows up, loses her slant but sometimes tries to regain it, wonders where all the bitterness came from, questions the worth of life. "'Tis the night before Christmas and all through the house I am Adah who expects no gifts." I agree with her that we cannot shed our past; we carry the marks and that's important. "We are our injuries as much as we are our successes." "If chained is where you have been, your arms will always bear marks of the shackles."
Basically, so much love.

Summer Reading

-- Anna Karenina by Tolstoy. I have a Russian friend who assures me that this is one of Tolstoy's more readable works. I don't see that as encouraging, because at some points I was suffering through AK. Not all -- there were parts when I wanted to keep reading; it does better than Troilus and Cressida did last summer. At the beginning I liked Anna and Kitty, and I thought Levin could be likable. Dolly was okay. At the end I liked Kitty, Levin, and Dolly, though I didn't really like Kitty's and Levin's moments when they thought they'd discovered the meaning of life and then decided it wasn't worth it and probably wasn't the meaning of life, anyway. I also felt somewhat sorry for Vronsky, whom I hadn't liked at all at the beginning. I was also told by my Russian friend that no one actually reads the parts where Levin waxes philosophical about farming...oops. Except I'm probably supposed to since this is for school, so not-oops.

--Oresteia by Aeschylus. This is actually three plays, but they're meant to be shown together. This was a much easier read than Anna Karenina (and was for Western Civilization, not Literature). It was probably the most interesting summer reading, with the others being AK and Old Testament excerpts. In Civ we've used this to bring up lots of moral issues, discussing Agamemnon's sacrifice of Iphigenia and the murders of Agamemnon and Cassandra and then of Clytaemnestra and her lover.

3. Shakespeare
This summer I read King Lear and Macbeth. In both, more happened more quickly than I expected (especially in Lear), but I really enjoyed both. I think I preferred Macbeth -- I found it more quotable, which is something I love about Shakespeare plays. As much as I liked Lear overall, the pity-inducing scenes were less enjoyable. Macbeth lacked that; it's possible but not nearly as easy to feel sorry for Macbeth, even with him so seemingly weary at the end.

4. Matthew/Matthieu/Mateo
For Lent, I read Matthew thrice in three different languages. I still know Luke best, but I think I know Matthew much better than I did before Lent. I'm planning on reading Mark next year.

5. World Literature
Compared to my other high school English classes, we've read a lot. We started by going over AK, and then:

--Notes from the Underground by Dostoyevsky. I believe this has been the least favorite of almost the entire senior class. It's ranty, self-contradicting, whiny, and very existentialist. There must be people who like existentialist writing; I can't handle it. This gave me (unsurprisingly) the same slimy feeling as Camus' L'etranger.

--Madame Bovary by Flaubert. One of my two favorites that we've read. Emma can be annoying and frustrating (dear girl, stop buying things!), but the realism over romanticism attracted me. I also read parts of it in French, which was awesome. Flaubert writes beautifully and somehow manages to write description that doesn't bore me. I still can't see it, but he writes other senses, too, which makes that easier.

--Heart of Darkness by Conrad. The jungle/darkness description got old. This was probably the easiest to *read* up to this point, but I was less willing to sit down and read than I was to read MB. We spent a lot of time on this in class, especially for it being rather short.

--Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man by Joyce. Necessary note: My World Lit teacher loves Joyce. She spent six weeks one year studying Ulysses in depth with a few other people. I was not so fond of Joyce. Sometimes better than Conrad, sometimes not. The first two parts of five were pretty hard for me to read, but then it got easier -- yes, even the going on and on and on about hell was easier than reading little boy Stephen. (However, perhaps the best quote of the book is about wetting the bed.) Favorite line: "I will not serve that in which I no longer believe..."

--As I Lay Dying by Faulkner. This is my other favorite from this semester. It's a very easy read, and Faulkner writes rural Mississippi accents beautifully. The characters are very frustrating, but really I was sympathetic to everyone but Anse, the father. I know people who despise the book, mostly because the family acts so stupidly, but I enjoyed it. Then again, being one of my favorites from this semester isn't saying much.

6. Special Project
For Western Civilization I am working on a History Day project about Euclid and the establishment of rigorous mathematics. I read parts of several books for the project, and at this point I've come to the conclusion that Euclid was not the originator of rigorous proof or the structure of mathematics, but he was the one who made it popular and established the structure as standard through the Elements. However, plodding through large sections of Euclid's Elements has not made me like geometry much more than I did before.

7. Other reading

--Apollo's Angels by Jennifer Homans. This is a history of ballet, and I talked about it far too much for a couple of weeks. The first two or three chapters were very dry, but then it quickly became more readable. I knew nothing about Danish ballet, so I found that chapter very interesting, and a lot of my conceptions of Italian and Russian ballet were very off. I disagree with the epilogue -- Homans argues that ballet is dying, titling the chapter "The Masters Are Dead and Gone." I don't think ballet is dead; in fact, I think it's very much alive. Around here, at least, the local ballet company was near dead four years ago and has almost completely recovered.

--Telling True Stories. This is an anthology of short essays about (mostly) narrative journalism by lots of narrative journalists. I don't write that much nonfiction, but this was still really interesting. A lot of the advice about writing and research applies to fiction, as well, and the section on ethics (perhaps the part that is least applicable to fiction) was one of the more interesting sections.

--Mastiff by Tamora Pierce. Third and final book in the PD trilogy, released five years after Terrier and two and a half years after Bloodhound. Finally. Parts of this book I really loved, and parts were disappointing. I like Farmer/Beka better than any other Beka pairing, and I in general really like Farmer, so that made me happy. I thought Tunstall turning traitor could have been executed much better, though.

--Girl of Fire and Thorns by Rae Carson. This is Carson's first book, and I enjoyed it. (Adding it late because it was a Christmas gift!) Well-written strong girls rock, and Elisa fits that... well, eventually. Not so much at the beginning. She's an atypical heroine in a lot of ways, though, and I like that. It disappointed me some that her increased confidence was correlated with her weight loss, though the two were more results of the same thing than one causing the other. (So correlation not causation.) While the prophecy that everyone knows about except the one of whom the prophecy speaks isn't that original, the fact that it was the result of a translation disagreement made me happy. I was also impressed by the world building -- I love the language, religion, and history.

--Disney Imagineering Field Guide to Disney's Hollywood Studios. I think I own every Imagineering Field Guide that's been written. I like seeing some of the concept art and the intent behind the attractions -- it's actually really interesting to see what was trying to be accomplished with some of the attractions that haven't been very successful, like Narnia.

--Rogue Crew by Brian Jacques. The last Redwall book, and I actually haven't finished it, and I won't until 2012 because I left it at school. So far, I'm enjoying it, and the Rogue Crew of otters is mysterious and awesome, especially with the Long Patrol along.

Saturday, July 2, 2011

Favorite Original VBS Songs Ever

...well, not ever. On the CDs I've heard.

Cokesbury
-- 2006: Adventure of the Treasure Seekers: God With Us
-- 2009: Camp EDGE: Shout, Here I Am!
-- 2009: Camp EDGE: Left, Right, In God's Sight
-- 2010: Galactic Blast: Revolution
-- 1999: Good News at Gospel Rock: Good News at Gospel Rock
-- 2000: Can Do Kids: Can Do Kids
-- 2001: Way To Go!: Luke 10:27
--2001: Way To Go!: Hey, Hey Neighbor
--2002: God's Great Gallery: God's Great Gallery
-- 2002: God's Great Gallery: I Am a Masterpiece
-- 2002: God's Great Gallery: Go Into All the World
-- 2003: Lighthouse Kids: Psalm 27
-- 2003: Lighthouse Kids: Ephesians 5:8
-- 2004: Hero Quest: More than Muscles Make Me Strong
-- 2005: Ranch House Kids: Circle G Ranch

Favorite Theme Song: God's Great Gallery
Favorite Bible verse song: Ugh, this is so hard! I have to go with Psalm 27, though.
Favorite preschool song: I'm Shining for the Lord (Lighthouse Kids, 2003)
Favorite silly song: Mallery the Gallery Mouse (God's Great Gallery, 2002)
Favorite arrangement of a non-original song: Let Everything That Has Breath (Galactic Blast, 2010 -- Matt Redman, I think)
Favorite music year: It's between God's Great Gallery and Lighthouse Kids -- two consecutive amazing years of music.
Single favorite song: The Bible verse song decision made this one for me -- Psalm 27.

2011 is absent from the list because I don't have the full cd yet. *wrinkles nose* 2007 and 2008 are absent because in 2007 (Lift Off!) I liked the music, but none of the songs make this list, and in 2008 (Beach Party) I never really warmed up to the music.

Group
-- 2009: Sing and Play Swamp Stomp Music: We Can Trust Him
-- 2010: High Seas Expedition: Vast Voyage
-- 2011: Hometown Nazareth: You Gave (John 14:19 b)
-- 2011: Pandamania: God is Listening
-- 2003: SCUBA Sing and Play Splash: Your Everlasting Love
-- 2005: Sing and Play Ole: Never Be the Same

Favorite Theme Song: Vast Voyage
Favorite Bible verse song: John 14:19b
Favorite arrangement of a non-original song: Everlasting God (Chris Tomlin, Swamp Stomp, 2009)
Favorite music year: 2009 Sing and Play Swamp Stomp.
Single favorite song: We Can Trust Him or Everlasting God

I don't know Group's music as well -- I have their easy VBS for 2003, 2005, 2006, 2009, 2010, and 2011, and then three of the Biblical ones. That's not the only reason this was harder, though -- Group uses more non-original songs than Cokesbury does. Some of the years I'm looking at on Group are more than half non-original.

Other
I seem to remember liking Standard's music.
Also, Hey God Let's Talk was meant as a VBS of sorts (or something similar), and I love the HGLT songs -- the theme song, the slower version of the Lord's Prayer, No Slow Grow and Go, and I Need You Now.

Saturday, December 25, 2010

The Annual Book Post, 2010 version

Unfortunately, I haven't read outside of school as much this year as I have in the past couple of years -- but to make up for that, I've read *lots* more for school. While I don't always like what we read in American Lit, at least we're reading.

1. This summer I finished reading Shakespeare's comedies and romances. The ones I had left were Measure for Measure, Pericles, and Troilus and Cressida. Of those, my favorite by far was Pericles -- it's definitely my favorite romance, which puts it on the complete list somewhere around Midsummer Night's Dream. MfM was okay, not bad. TaC, however...if I hadn't been trying to read all the the comedies and all the romances, I would have stopped reading after Act II. In English II, we read Julius Caesar, which goes with this list. Ish.

2. The Sable Quean -- newest Redwall book. It actually took me to Thanksgiving to get around to it. Flib the shrew, the mole dibbuns, and Buck make me happy. I also like that Buck and one of the two main villains are swordbeasts -- so strange, that I would be fond of swords. ;) I didn't really like how far away the other main villain, Vilaya, stayed throughout the book. I understand that the distance was part of her; she was a secret even to the beasts that served her, but I wish there had been more motivation there.

3. The Calligrapher's Daughter. I like books about Korea during the first half of the 20th century, and this one is full of pretty. I thought the chapters that changed away from Najin's viewpoint were a little random, and I definitely liked Najin's voice best.

4. Jean de Florette and Manon des Sources. I read these in French with my teacher in the spring. Sometimes I don't really like the style of the books, but when there's *story* going on I found them very interesting. I also liked seeing the southern accent written down -- I hadn't really seen written accent in French, and since that's something I like so much in English, it was cool to see it in French.

5. Luke/Luc/Lucas -- during Lent, I read Luke twice. And I didn't really read Luke, just Luc and Lucas -- French and Spanish. Luke is now definitely the gospel I know best, if it wasn't already.

6. Jean, 1 Jean, 2 Jean, 3 Jean, Ecclesiastes, Esther, Ruth, 1 Samuel, 2 Samuel, 1 Rois, 2 Rois -- okay, I haven't finished 2 Kings yet, but I'm getting there. After that, I'm not really sure what I'm going to read. I might change to something very different and get away from the history, or I might be too curious about all those, "And aren't the rest of (name)'s works written down in the Chronicles?" But I should finish 2 Kings before deciding. Anyway, I've had my French Bible at school, and so I've been reading. Lots of John, and then I got tired of John, so I read Ecclesiastes, which is my father's favorite book of the Bible. Then I went and did histories. Esther and Ruth took me all of three nights combined. The Samuels and the Kings, on the other hand, have taken me two or three months.

7. Of Mice and Men and The Heart is a Lonely Hunter. These were part of my summer reading for Lit. I really liked Of Mice and Men, but compared to the short stories and THiaLH, we didn't do much with it. I found THiaLH very heavy and *silent* the first two times I read it, but after going over it in class, I like it better. I guess it makes more sense, and I fill the silence myself.

And now for reading that's not actually books:

8. "Parker Adderson, Philosopher," "Chickamauga," "The Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge." Ambrose Bierce is...a good writer. And a little depressing. But he definitely gets his point across. And all of these stories are about the Civil War. We'll do more naturalism next semester.

9. Transcendentalism. I like Emily Dickinson. Bryant's okay. Melville is just wordy (Bartleby is *boring*), and I don't know what I think of Whitman. Thoreau and Emerson are both readable, I suppose. I was glad to get out of Transcendentalism.

10. Romanticism that isn't Transcendentalism -- Translation: Hawthorne and Irving. I actually like Irving, though not much happens in a lot of words. Hawthorne actually makes use of the words. As a general rule, I like this category better than the above, because (though we didn't read any) Poe falls here, too.

11. Realism -- we're finishing this up next semester, but we've read stuff by Kate Chopin (yay! really, really liked), Paul Dunbar ("We Wear the Mask" was good, and I liked it better than the short story of his we read), and William Dean Howell.

12. "Bernice Bobs her Hair" (Fitzgerald), "I'm a Fool" (Sherwood Anderson), "Almos' a Man" (Wright), "The Displaced Person" (Flannery O'Connor).
Bernice is my favorite of these, followed by Displaced Person. These were all part of our summer reading.

...
I promise I read other things (and reread too much. As usual), like If I Stay, which I could make into a decent DI if I were still doing Speech. These were the most memorable readings, though.

Monday, December 21, 2009

Books

I haven't read as much this year as I read in 2006, 2007, or 2008, but that's okay, and I still wanted to do a book post.

I reread last year's book post, and I noticed that I didn't mention Graceling by Kristin Cashore. I don't remember when I read it. It came out in October 2008, so who knows when I read it. Anyway, I really liked Graceling, and this October Fire came out. Fire occurs before Graceling, but isn't really a prequel; it's more of a companion novel. The two books only have one character in common.

This year I read the following Shakespeare plays: Merchant of Venice, All's Well that Ends Well, Merry Wives of Windsor, Cymbeline, Love's Labour's Lost, Two Gentlemen of Verona, The Winter's Tale, The Tempest, and The Taming of the Shrew.
My favorite of those is Merchant of Venice. I think it's the best written of Shakespeare's comedies, though I think Much Ado About Nothing is still my overall favorite.
I also really liked Merry Wives of Windsor and The Tempest. I didn't like All's Well that Ends Well or Two Gentlemen of Verona.

I already mentioned Fire, and I like it as much as I liked Graceling. Maybe more? I'm not sure. I'll have to reread Graceling and see. The third book, which is a sequel to Graceling, is called Bitterblue and is coming out...sometime.

This year, for my birthday, my mother gave me a very tall stack of books. They're mostly fluffy books -- but fluffy books that I like. Noel Streatfeild, Jean Estoril. The stack included some books not published in the U.S. I read all of them after the AP exams, though I'm not sure if it was a reward or simply a way to relax -- fluff instead of study books. The stack also included two books by Lorna Hill, which were okay, but not as good as the others.

In April, Bloodhound came out. Bloodhound is the second book in Tamora Pierce's Rebakah Cooper trilogy, and it came out right before my birthday...so I got Bloodhound for my birthday. I didn't save it for after the AP exams. I read it immediately. Now I am eagerly awaiting Mastiff, which still has TBA 2010 as its publication date on the website. Grr. But considering I was able to wait 2.5 years for Bloodhound after Terrier, I shouldn't be this impatient. *sigh*
Also by Tamora Pierce -- I hadn't read Trickster's Choice and Trickster's Queen until this month -- actually, this past week. They're very good, though one thing kept bothering me off and on as I read. Lady Knight, the last book in the Protector of the Small quartet, occurred in the year 450. Trickster's Choice begins in the year 452, but it feels like it is supposed to start the spring after Lady Knight, which would be 451. But that's minor, and not really part of the book, since the dates are mostly there to help keep track of when events within the series happen in relation to each other.

Books I read in French this year: Un long dimanche de fiançailles, Comme un roman, Autour du monde en 80 jours, Chagrin d'école. Actually, I haven't finished the last one. I feel like there was at least one other book, but I don't remember. And I can't remember when I read Candide -- 2008 or 2009. I've liked all four of those books. Un long dimanche de fiançailles has a rather painful first chapter, but after that it is interesting and occasionally beautiful. I really like Verne's style and Autour du monde en 80 jours. Comme un roman and Chagrin d'école are both nonfiction by Daniel Pennac. The first is about reading, what's wrong with how it's taught, how it could be improved, etc. The second is about students who don't do well in school and feel they can't do well in school, and what is wrong that makes this true. Pennac has a really beautiful way of stating things, and I like the topics.

Last spring in English class we read Tale of Two Cities. I liked the plot and admire Dickens' ability to weave a complicated plot, but the verbosity...*shudders*
Our summer reading in English was To Kill a Mockingbird and Night. I hadn't read either before, and neither one took me much time. I didn't really like Night, and I loved To Kill a Mockingbird.

This semester in English we haven't really read anything. Okay, okay, so we've read some interesting short stories. We've also read some not-very-interesting short stories.
Also in English class, we have started having one day per week to read, and then we have to write a reflective paragraph. I read The Tempest, and now I'm reading Invisible Man. I'm not far in Invisible Man, but it's a good book, though it goes from very intense to almost light (though not quite) rather quickly.

This summer at Mathcamp I read Life of Galileo by Bertolt Brecht.
Oh my goodness.
I think I'm at least slightly obsessed with this play. I like Brecht's style, and the play made me think perhaps more than any other novel or play I've read. Scene 14 is my favorite, and it might not be an exaggeration if I said that I had that scene half memorized. Well, maybe a little bit of an exaggeration. Not much, though.

I reread a few Horrible Histories -- the special one about France, the two about WWII, the one about WWI, the one about the Georgians, the one about revolutions, and the one about the Tudors are the ones that I can think of. I read Righting the Mother Tongue by David Wolman, which was interesting.

I read the first two books in the Alchemyst series by Michael Scott. They're okay. I might read the other books, but I don't know.
I read Sasha by Joel Shepard. It's pretty good; I would read the future books in the series. I thought it was a little bit slow at times, even during battle scenes, but still liked it.

(Some books I mentioned here I mentioned because I read them recently and remember them well, so I'm sure there are some notable books that I read last spring that I'm forgetting. If I remember them, I'll edit this post.)

Friday, November 20, 2009

Speech Meet!

Tomorrow is my second speech meet of the year. The first one didn't go great, so I'm hoping tomorrow will be better. I also have my first ever conflict -- in prelims! Hooray!

On an entirely different note, I was informed today that when I presented in Spanish class yesterday, I had a French accent as opposed to an American one. I don't know if I like the idea of that or not.

Sunday, July 26, 2009

Mathcamp

Mathcamp quotes, usually taken completely out of context!

"I don't discriminate against silicon based life forms!"

"If you program a computer to grow towards the light, is it a plant? YES!"

"The other three boys on the team were male..."

"I don't think the campers are distinct. All campers are the same."

"Are his shoulders distinct?"

"Oh no, I got ketchup in my ketchup!"
(later)
"Great, now I've got keys in my ketchup!"

"Mathcamp has destroyed my ability to enunciate or pronunciate anything!"

"Giraffes are not made of metal."

"Optimal Bear Strategy: n-1 bears on same hyperplane as camper. One bear, Bear A, on hyperplane perpendicular to other one. n-1 bears follow plan n-1. Bear A follows plan 1. Camper is eaten."

"Algebraic Topology, Topics in Topology, Bears = Topology...TOPOLOGY."

"If you want to know if there are any other Mathcampers nearby, call out, 'I lost!'"
(group breaks out into "I lost" and "Apple lobster.")
"I can't believe I'm actually encouraging this."

"All these people touring in the summer must think that UPS is full of people in sarongs."

"If we find a model that believes ZFC, then ZFC is consistent, which means ZFC is inconsistent, so the universe explodes and we all die."

"NO! Why is there a diamond on the chalkboard!"

"Cats are more likely to fly then dogs are?"

"Hello! That is Nathan. He is speaking in his native language of food tongue."

"Tomato crush water..."
"Hey! Rule 4. Rule 4!"

"No two campers are not on fire."

Saturday, July 4, 2009

June 10

Madame had said that we would meet downstairs at 8:30 on Wednesday morning. Jeanne, Melissa, and Stephanie were up at 7:30 and downstairs by 8:25. At 8:40, Cate, Madame, and I still weren't there. The other girls came upstairs and found us asleep. Oops...no one had set an alarm. We apologized repeatedly, and the others went to get breakfast while we showered and got dressed. They came back with pain au chocolat and a bottle of apple-orange-passion fruit juice. As we ate, we also commented on Madame's blog, though Madame insisted we keep the comments short.
When we got downstairs, we discovered that right outside the hotel was a market, which we walked around in for fifteen or twenty minutes. Then we went to the Opera Garnier. When we exited the metro station, we expected to immediately see the amazing Opera, but instead were surrounded by a crowd of people. Oh yeah, it was that protest Madame had heard about on TV!
Once we got inside the Opera, we bought our tickets for the unguided visit. Madame stayed on a bench near the ticket window while we spent an hour walking through the building, which is absolutely gorgeous.
We walked down a hallway to the grand staircase. Melissa later mentioned imagining a ball, and she's right. It's easy to picture a girl sweeping down those stairs in a large dress -- Cate said a prom dress; Melissa and Stephanie imagined quinceanera dresses.
Melissa and I went a little bit ahead of the others (they were taking pictures of each other). We could have walked around for a while before going into the theater, but we went in immediately. I remembered how gorgeous the place was -- as I nine year old I had told my mother that "it would mean something" to dance on the Palais Garnier stage.
The first thing you see when you go into one of the boxes is red velvet. The boxes and seats are covered in it, with gold detailing. You look across the theater and see more of the boxes and seats; you see the columns and railings, and they are in gold and so intricate. Then you see the ceiling. The small white lights are all in a circle, against the intricate gold, and then there's the colorful almost childlike paiting, with yellow, green, red, blue, white, and smaller but just as colorful characters on top of the color splashes. It is modern and yet ancient, held by no formal rules.
And then you can see the chandelier, which is gold and of many white lights, bigger than any photo demonstrate.
The place is magnificent, exquisite. I cannot imagine being a dancer on that stage of the red velvet curtain.
Oh yes, the stage. There were stage hands doing something; I couldn't tell what. The set was a white-gray, all big doors, pipes, and columns. It had a modern feel to it, but I later found out it was the set for a little performed, 18th century opera. Hmm. There was one large window on the set, looking onto onto blackness and one half of what was implied to be a full moon.
Melissa and I then got the other girls and took them into the box. They were amazed, especially Jeanne, who is a Phantom of the Opera fan. Seeing the setting for PotO was especially exciting for her. We then walked down into the museum, which has paintings of dancers, actors, different plays, operas, ballets, and audiences. There were also models of sets for scenes in different plays -- those were very cool to see.
After we finished at the Opera Garnier, Madame gave us 1.5 hours of shopping time at Melissa and Stephanie's request. I walked all the way around the Opera and looked into the Swatch shop, then went into a cafe where Madame was. I ate a croque monsieur and read Petit Nicolas, and Madame had soupe a l'oignon then a main dish. At 1:30, Jeanne and Cate came back, having finished their shopping. They had looked forever for a perfume shop and had finally found one, where Jeanne had selected a perfume for a friend who had given her $100 and said, "Buy me something cool." They then went to a small sandwich shop and ate.
Stephanie and Melissa came back at 2:00, Stephanie with a sandwich. They both complained that the shopping had been better in Amiens, but they had saved their money for Paris. Oh well. Melissa had bought a large black purse, and Stephanie had bought jeans. We got on the bus and went over to the Musee Cluny.
On the bus, Jeanne discovered that her Paris Visite ticket was missing. Therefore, she had to pay for the bus. she then came and sat beside me and asked if I had known that the five of us were paying for Madame's museum tickets. No, I'd thought it would just be transportation, as had Jeanne. This was a problem for her, because she had not been given much spending money. The other girls complained, too. Not Cate, who argued that Madame was being our tour guide, but the others, who said that sure, Madame was being our tour guide, but she wasn't always doing a great job of it.
I thought that Madame was trying to get us to see what was considered important and not consulting us, though she insisted many times that it was our trip, that she would be back in Paris the next year and we might not.
In the Cluny, Madame rushed us through the museum except for a few rooms where she allowed us to browse. She immediately led us to the room of the Lady and the Unicorn tapestries. They are intricate and well done, as opposed to busy, and in the appealing mille fleurs style, but I didn't find them very interesting, even after Madame explained how each one is related to a sense, and then how the sixth is about obedience and love. They are excellent tapestries, the best examples from the time, but not what I want to spend much time looking at...
After the Cluny, we took the metro to the Louvre, where some people did miniscule shopping -- Cate bought candy for her sister and Madame sent a postcard -- but most of us spent the majority of the 45 minutes hanging in the Starbucks. We all reimbursed Madame for what she had spent on museum entrance that day.
Then we went into the Louvre. Madame immediately led us to the Winged Victory of Samothrace. It is a beautiful statue -- I prefer it to the Venus de Milo. After that, we made our way to the Mona Lisa, called La Joconde in French. I tried to take pictures, but couldn't get a decent one. Besides, she hasn't exactly changed in the past five years. I know it's an amazing painting, but I'm not very interested in the period of style. Then we saw The Wedding At Cana, a huge painting that again, I couldn't get a decent picture of.
Crowing of Napoleon was next, and I managed to get an okay picture of it. Finally, we went and saw the Venus de Milo, whom I actually got a good picture of! Amazing! Then we left the Louvre, after seeing six major works and walking through the rooms that just happened to connect them.
After the Louvre, we went back to the hotel, stopping at Chatêlet to buy groceries that Cate and Madame wanted tot ake home. AT the hotel, Madame looked up the times for the Bateaux Parisiennes. We were going to try to make the 10:30 boat, but later didn't -- we called the taxi too late. Grr. Anyway, for supper we went to the Italian restaurant where Madame and I had eaten on Monday night. We all ordered pasta. I got a four cheese penne which wasn't great.
That night, we all hung out in room 405, so at 11:00 everyone got to see the Eiffel Tower dance. Stephanie got photos, and we all watched the Eiffel Tower perform as it does four times every night.

June 9

On Tuesday morning, we all met on the ground floor and went to a cafe for breakfast. The breakfast at this cafe was a hot drink, a croissant, and a tartine. I drank hot chocolate. After breakfast, we went to the Invalides. We took the bus, but got off too early, so we walked quite a ways. Five years ago I went to the Musee de Plan-Relief in the Invalides; this time we were going to see Napoleon's tomb. The building is very pretty on the inside, but I'm not a fan of the golden dome. All around the tomb were pictures explaining how Napoleon bettered France.
After the Invalides, we went to Montmartre. We did a little bit of tourist shopping -- I bought postcards and magnets. Madame found a bookstore where she bought a Petit Nicolas book that I started to read later. After shopping, we found a small Italian restaurant. I had lasagna. We talked about songs that are very popular at the moment, but there weren't many that I had heard of, which isn't all that surprising.
Then we went to Sacre Coeur. Photos weren't allowed inside, but the photos of the outside are impressing enough.
The five of us (not Madame) went up into the dome of the basilica. I remembered what a hard climb it was -- twisty, narrow, steep...but I didn't quite remember how many spiral stairs there are. They go on forever, and then its still a long way to the top -- with another spiral staircase before you gets there. Up and down...down to go up? Yes. Those 294 steps are completely crazy. But once you get to the top, it's worth it, because you can see all of Paris, as if it never ends -- you can even see La Defense where all the skyscrapers are.
Then we shopped in the Montmartre area. I didn't shop, because I'd bought postcards and magnets earlier, which is essentially what I wanted to buy. (And I hadn't had any luck finding a gargoyle keychain, the other thing I was looking for, so I figured they would be more likely to be found near Notre Dame). So I sat in a cafe with Madame and read Petit Nicolas. Jeanne and Cate bought presents for their friends and family, finished pretty quickly, and went to find an ATM. Melissa bought a portrait. I have no idea what Stephanie bought.
After Montmartre, we went back to the hotel. Cate, Madame, and I got on the computer. Pierrot was on Facebook, so Madame and Cate talked with him. I looked up who had won the spelling bee -- Kavya did it! We all read our email, and a certain friend of mine wrote to me in German. I understood some of it, though not all...so I answered what I could.
For dinner, we went back to the St. Michel area because there are lots of restaurantst there that serve raclette and fondue. However, despite the fact that we were there for those specialties, everyone but Jeanne and I ordered off the menu. Jeanne just ordered chicken (she wasn't very hungry), and I got raclette. Yum. Cooking your own food is fun. I was given cheese (raclette cheese -- that's where the dish gets its name), some meats, and potatoes. And I'm pretty sure raclette is now my favorite French food.
Madame argued with the server about whether or not she had ordered off the menu. Madame had not said menu when she was ordering, but she had started to order her main dish after ordering her appetizer, and the server had stopped her. So they were both right, in a way -- Madame saying the waiter had stopped her when she tried to order her main dish, the waiter saying Madame had not told him she was ordering off the menu.
After supper we walked around the area. I did find a gargoyle keychain, which was good. We took pictures of Notre Dame and of the Seine. On the bank of the Seine an Italian film was being made.
We were very late getting back to the hotel. I'm not sure how many metros came through Dupleix after the one we got off of, actually. We got to the hotel at 12:40 or 12:50. Madame blogged, and Cate and I laughed some at Madame's way of phrasing things. Her blog made everything seem so perfect sometimes...it was ridiculous, but funny. We saw the Eiffel Tower dance at 1:00, which is when it closes and the base lights turn off, so it was just the white lights sparkling.

Friday, July 3, 2009

June 8

Our train for Paris was leaving at 10:30, so we woke up around 8:00, finished any packing, and took a taxi to the Lisieux train station. Once again we ate breakfast at the cafe next door.
We thought we were going to have reserved seats on the train, but actually, the reserved seats had been for an earlier train to Paris. Oops. So once again, we had to take whatever seat was available and hope that no one had reserved it.
When we got to St. Lazare station in Paris, we went right outside to a Greek restaurant. There was not enough room in the restaurant for our suitcases; that was obvious, but for some reason Madame ignored it. Therefore, after we ordered, everyone but Madame stood outside with the bags. Then, she started calling us back in by what we had ordered -- they had gotten our order wrong? I'm not really sure what happened, and at the end we still didn't end up with what we had ordered, but we all survived. (For example, one of us ended up with chicken instead of meatballs. Poulet, boulettes...) We went back into the station to eat.
While in the station, we met an American veteran who was headed up to the Normandy beaches. Melissa was very excited, because so far we had not met any Americans, and she had been very disappointed by that.
We took the metro from St. Lazare to Dupleix. We changed somewhere, but I don't recall what station. Dupleix is on line 6, and only line 6, but it was very close to our hotel. Anyway. We went up and down so many stairs through the metro stations. Cate, Jeanne, and I would carry down our suitcases, one person would stay down, and the other two would go back up. Melissa and Stephanie would go down the stairs carrying one of their suitcases together, and then go back up and do the other one. Then the two of Cate, Jeanne, and I that had gone back up would carry down Madame's large suitcase, and Madame would carry down her small one. This was very tedious with lots of stairs in lots of different places.
When we got to the hotel it was raining -- the rain had arrived earlier than forecasted. We got our hotel keys and went up to our rooms to unpack. Jeanne, Stephanie, and Melissa took the room with a courtyard view, room 216. Madame, Cate, and I got room 405, which looked out onto the street. We could see the Eiffel Tower from our room, and the metro went right by it. The courtyard view ended up not being so beautiful as it sounded, but it was away from the noise of the road -- which wasn't that loud in the first place, though some people would have been annoyed by the metro.
The first thing we did was visit the Eiffel Tower. Like I said, it was raining, and Madame had decided not to go up. Having already been once, I stayed down with Madame (though I don't know if that was a good decision) while the other four girls went up the Tower. At first, they looked at the line and said they would take the stairs, but Madame told them that the line moved very quickly and was actually short at the moment. I think they were crazy to even consider the stairs. I don't know how anyone could climb up and down the Eiffel Tower in a reasonable amount of time. Madame and I looked in the gift shop, and she took my picture in front of a statue of George Eiffel (an amazing engineer).
While we were trying to stay out of the rain, we met two Mexican tourists who did not speak French and spoke very little English. So, I tried to speak to them in Spanish. It was terrible! I kept saying things I knew were wrong...and then they started asking about Versailles. Madame wanted me to explain to them that there is a package available in the RER stations which includes transportation and entrance to Versailles. Umm...that's a bit too much...maybe next year...so we waited for Melissa and Stephanie to get back. When they did, they translated for the tourists and Madame.
We then walked to the Human Rights Square. It was only slightly interesting, but from there one can take excellent photos of the Eiffel Tower. After that we went to the Arc de Triumphe. There was a military ceremony there, so we were not able to go up. We heard the Marseillaise played mutliple times. Allons enfants de la patrie...
And then we explored Champs-Elysees in the rain. O Champs-Elysees...but it wasn't too interesting for me. I don't shop. We took the metro to Place de la Concorde, where Madame explained how there had been guillotines there during the revolution and the Terror, and then she told us about the obelisk. After that, we got on the metro to Dupleix. It was raining very hard.
When we arrived at Dupleix, it had stopped raining, but the other girls were soaked. (I had worn my rain jacket and therefore only my shoes and the bottom of my jeans were wet). They went up to the hotel rooms to change, and Madame and I went to an Italian restaurant. We told the girls which one, and that they could meet us there, or they could go to another restaurant. (They chose the latter option, though also ended up eating Italian food...) I ate another Regina pizza. And then I had mousse au chocolat for dessert! Yum.
But the oil was in old wine bottles shaped like American footballs...weird.
Both groups arrived at the hotel at the same time. We were all fairly worn out, so we went up to our rooms. Madame, Cate, and I saw the Eiffel Tower "dance" at 10:00 and at 11:00 (the lights flash)...the Eiffel Tower is so beautiful at night. Madame blogged, and Cate and I commented.